We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Is It True That Little Earthquakes are Precursors to Big Earthquakes?

Tricia Christensen
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The question of predicting earthquakes and how to tell if the Big One is coming remains a mystery. In recent years, several prediction models have been advanced, including the possibility of measuring thermal patterns of heat on the earth, from space, in order to serve as a predictor. Scientists have poked holes in this latest theory, and much to everyone’s dismay, no one single method is reliable for determining when an earthquake will occur. What does remain fairly constant is that most large earthquakes occur on fault lines, where constant pressure from underlying tectonic plates can make the ground suddenly shake, rattle and roll. Scientists can thus say that larger earthquakes are much more likely along fault lines, especially some noted faults like the San Andreas Fault that runs through much of California.

The question of whether little earthquakes are precursors to big earthquakes is thus a complex one. First, you’d have to define little earthquakes; are these the ones people don’t generally feel, or are they small 2.0-3.0 quakes that a few people will feel? Even then, if you do arrive at a definition you can’t say definitively that little earthquakes always come before big ones.

For instance, in California, if you look at the US Geological Survey (USGS) website, you can count hundreds of earthquakes that aren’t even felt, occurring with great regularity. If these little earthquakes are precursors to big earthquakes, then we’d constantly be having large earthquakes. On the other hand, small earthquakes suggest a certain level of fault line activity and pressure building up, and scientists regularly suggest that we must all prepare for the Big One, since it could occur at any time. Thus you can say small earthquakes may presage big earthquakes because they do suggest that eventually, at some point in the future, a big earthquake is likely.

When a large earthquake occurs, the earthquakes in the days prior are called foreshocks. The small earthquakes that occur after a large earthquake are called aftershocks. Little earthquakes don’t necessarily have to be either, but scientists may cluster earthquake activity before and after a large earthquake in the hopes of better understanding how and why earthquakes occur and under what circumstances they are most likely. Still, using the theory that little earthquakes are precursors to big earthquakes is not sound science. Only some of them are. It’s more accurate to suggest that active fault lines that produce these tiny unfelt shakers are likely at some point to produce larger earthquakes.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Tricia Christensen
By Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a All The Science contributor, Tricia Christensen is based in Northern California and brings a wealth of knowledge and passion to her writing. Her wide-ranging interests include reading, writing, medicine, art, film, history, politics, ethics, and religion, all of which she incorporates into her informative articles. Tricia is currently working on her first novel.
Discussion Comments
By anon333326 — On May 04, 2013

There are near constant earthquakes of magnitude 1 in California. If you subscribe to the earthquake app and ask for alerts in LA, you will be getting new alerts every few minutes.

By anon327225 — On Mar 26, 2013

After reading the above post, it makes me worry about the people there in Mexico. Seems like they have had several hits of quakes there in Mexico City, I believe it was two years ago and on a Monday. March or April. Just worrisome. I forget the numbers of the quake, but it was lower, I think than this time.

By aplenty — On Mar 15, 2011

@istria- The mathematical difference in the amount of energy released by an earthquake is somewhat complicated. It involves complex mathematics and it ultimately depends on if the magnitude is given on the moment magnitude scale or the Richter scale.

To make things simple, a difference of 1.0 is the equivalent of 36 times more energy released, and a difference of 2.0 is roughly equivalent to a 1000 times increase in energy released. As an example, the energy released in the recent Sendai Earthquake is almost a thousand times more powerful than the Loma Preita quake that collapsed freeways and injured thousands.

By istria — On Mar 13, 2011

@ Glasshouse- I have been glued to the news lately because I have family members in and around the Tokyo area. My uncle is a Japanese American dual citizen and his wife is from a coastal town in Northern Japan. They have been able to locate her family, but her parents lost their entire house.

The earthquake photos really show the devastation that the earthquake and tsunami caused. I have been in an a few earthquakes in Hawaii and California, but obviously nothing as big as the one in Japan. I wonder what the difference in strength is between a 6.8 quake (World Series) and an 8.9 quake is.

By Glasshouse — On Mar 12, 2011

It seems like in some instances a large earthquake can be a precursor to an even larger earthquake. Just like how Northern Japan experienced a large earthquake somewhere in the 7.0 range, and not even a week later the same general area was struck by the largest earthquake in Japanese history. An 8.9 magnitude quake shook for between one and four minutes according to multiple sources.

The result of the earthquake was an immediate tsunami that inundated the city near the epicenter with a 10-meter tall wall of water. The damage estimates are in the billions with multiple nuclear reactors affected, hundreds dead, and entire cities underwater. Who would have expected this after a magnitude seven earlier in the week?

Tricia Christensen
Tricia Christensen
With a Literature degree from Sonoma State University and years of experience as a All The Science contributor, Tricia...
Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.