We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What are the Largest Non-Nuclear Explosions in History?

Michael Anissimov
Updated: May 21, 2024

Since the invention of high explosives, there have been numerous powerful non-nuclear explosions which have killed or injured upwards of 1,000 people at a time. Because measuring the exact magnitude of an explosion is impossible without careful measurements, and most large non-nuclear explosions are in fact accidental, it is impossible to say which of these explosions is the largest. Often, the amount of explosives detonated is known, but the size of an explosion cannot be directly calculated from the weight of the explosives alone, so an accurate ranking scheme is impossible.

There are five major non-nuclear explosions that many agree are among the largest, if not the largest:

  • The Halifax explosion (1917, estimated equivalent 2.9 kilotons (kt) of TNT)
  • The Texas City disaster (1947, 2 - 4 kt)
  • The "British Bang" military test on Heligoland in the North Sea (1947, 4 kt)
  • The Minor Scale military test in New Mexico (1985, 4 kt)
  • The Port Chicago disaster (1944, 5 kt)

The Halifax explosion, which occurred on 6 December 1917, in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, resulted from the collision of a French cargo ship carrying 5.8 million pounds (2,653 tonnes) of explosives with a Norwegian ship. The ship was fully loaded, carrying explosives for shipment to Europe for use during World War I. The resulting non-nuclear explosion was about a third the strength of the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. About 2,000 people, mostly Canadians, died, and 9,000 were injured. The entire harbor was destroyed.

The "British Bang" and Minor Scale non-nuclear explosions were military tests, both designed to simulate nuclear explosions. Both involved several thousand tonnes of explosives, and had a magnitude similar to the Halifax explosion, but no one was hurt. The British Bang was carried out on the island of Heligoland, while Minor Scale was conducted at the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico. During Minor Scale, 9.6 million pounds (4,350 tonnes) of high explosive was detonated.

Both the Texas City disaster and the Port Chicago disaster were tragic repeats of the same general formula as the Halifax disaster. Fully loaded ships exploded while in port, killing several hundred people in both incidents. Although these non-nuclear explosions may have seemed very extreme to those caught in the blast, they are very small in comparison to the explosions produced by modern nuclear weapons.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.
Discussion Comments
By anon954437 — On Jun 01, 2014

About 4,000 odd tons of bombs in RAF store went up in 1944. Luckily, it was not close to a large city.

By Bolrog — On Jul 31, 2012

Also remember the four other super collisions from meteors that wiped out almost all life on earth on four separate occasions. Greenland's Crater discovered recently may have been 3 billion years ago when life first appeared on earth.

By anon282818 — On Jul 31, 2012

You forgot the Tunguska Explosion of 1908 that occurred in Siberia. It leveled thousands of trees in this remote area and is believed to have been the result of a comet disintegrating in the upper atmosphere above this region, causing a massive shock wave blast.

By anon100416 — On Jul 30, 2010

this category doesn't specify "man-made" explosions, so what about Mt. St. Helens (the explosion), and Krakatoa, which was heard about 3500 miles away?

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology...
Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.