We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.
Science

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

What is Availability Bias?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated: May 21, 2024

Availability bias is a human cognitive bias that causes people to overestimate the probability of events associated with memorable or vivid occurrences. Because memorable events are further magnified by coverage in the media, the bias is compounded on the societal level. Two prominent examples would be estimations of how likely plane accidents are to occur and how often children are abducted. Both events are quite rare, but the vast majority of the population believes that they are more common than they are and behaves accordingly.

In reality, people are much more likely to die from an auto accident than a plane accident, and children are more likely to die in an accident than get abducted. The majority of people think the reverse is true, however, because the less likely events are more "available" — more memorable. Looking at the literature or even just the interactions of daily life will reveal thousands of examples of availability bias in action.

Availability bias is at the root of many other human biases and culture-level effects. For instance, medieval medicine was probably barely more effective than leaving a malady alone to heal on its own, but because the times where the therapy "worked" are more available in the minds of many, practicing medicine was generally considered effective whether or not it really was.

The study of this bias was pioneered by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, who founded the field of "heuristics and biases" and developed a model called prospect theory to explain systematic bias in human decision-making. Kahneman subsequently won the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics for his work, despite having never taken an economics class. Tversky, his long-time partner in the research of heuristics and biases, died in 1996.

A concept intimately connected to availability bias is that of base-rate neglect. Base-rate neglect refers to integrating irrelevant information into a probability judgment, biasing it from the natural base rate. An example would be letting someone into a college just based on an interview, when empirical studies have shown that past performance and grades are the best possible indicator of future performance, and that interviews merely cloud the assessment. Because people like "seeing things for themselves," however, the interviews are likely to continue to take place, even in the absence of any support for their effectiveness.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.
Discussion Comments
By SilentBlue — On Jan 23, 2011

Statistics make it clear that there is little or no danger in boarding a plane or exiting a household. There is a danger in living, because at all times there is the potential of dying. This should not cause fear, however, because we all die at some point, and there is no use trying to assure ourselves of safety through stats.

By Tufenkian925 — On Jan 22, 2011

When a disaster occurs, it is often examined in the light of Black Swan Theory, which states that random occurrences of a large impact are often unquantifiable in normal terms. There are many free-radicals which influence large-scale events, and therefore would slip past people who have no availability bias, or a false, statistics-based, assurance of safety.

By FitzMaurice — On Jan 21, 2011

Overconfidence bias happens when a person believes themselves to be right on a particular issue in terms of answering questions. Sometimes these kinds of people can be assured due to a large amount of recognition from other ignorant people. Their confidence is a facade behind which there is little or no competence.

By BostonIrish — On Jan 18, 2011

I think there can be the effect of neglecting the legitimacy of these events as a reaction to availability bias. Some people say that things like these could never happen simply because everybody else is afraid of them happening. Then, when they actually do occur, the person is taken by surprise. This is the case of many people who go into war, they see others dying around them, but may feel invulnerable.

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology...
Learn more
Share
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.