We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Early History of Powered Flight?

Michael Anissimov
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Powered flight is a relatively recent pursuit, with the first controlled heavier-than-air powered flight occurring in Fairfield, Connecticut, by Gustave Whitehead, on 14 August 1901, predating the Wright Brothers’ flight at Kitty Hawk by over two years. Whitehead’s engine-powered plane, with long, hawk-like glider wings, flew over 800 meters at an altitude of 15 meters, according to sworn affadavits signed by 15 attendees of the historic powered flight. Also according to witness reports, (but without sworn affadavits) Whitehead flew over 1 km (over half a mile) in Pittsburgh as early as 1899. This would place the first milestone of heavier-than-air powered flight in the 19th century rather than the 20th. Two modern replicas of Whitehead’s “Number 22” plane have flown successfully.

The better-publicized efforts of the Wright Brothers culminated in the world- famous Kitty Hawk flights at Kill Devil Hills in North Carolina on 17 December 1903. These flights are regarded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Federation Aeronautique Internationale (FAI) as the first sustained, controlled, heavier-than-air manned powered flight, despite the earlier flight by Whitehead, which was not well publicized until the Wright Brothers’ fame was already ensured. In their simply designed Wright Flyer, Orville Wright flew 120 ft (37 m) in 12 seconds in the morning, following up with several more flights, including a fourth flight that covered 852 ft (260 m) in 59 seconds. All the flights were accompanied by an abrupt and unattended “landing,” caused by gusts acting on the early attempt at a flying machine.

Heaver-than-air aviation was all the rage in the first decade of the 20th century, with various inventors making claims, verified or otherwise, of short flights. Lyman Gilmore, for instance, claimed to have successfully flown a plane on 15 May 1902, but there are no witnesses. New Zealand farmer and inventor Richard Pearse supposedly constructed a monoplane aircraft that flew on 31 March, 1903, almost nine months before the Wright brothers flight. In 1904 and 1905, the Wright brothers conducted a further 150 flights at Huffman Prairie in Dayton, Ohio, inviting friends and family to attend. Due to a failed public flight attempt in May 1904, representatives of the media did not attend these later flights.

The history of powered flight experienced a major boost during World War I (1914-1918), when planes were used extensively in war by both the Allies and Central Powers. At first, it was considered ludicrous to use planes for warfare, but they ended up being adopted, first for reconnaissance, but soon for actual assaults.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.

Related Articles

Discussion Comments
By anon350035 — On Oct 01, 2013

There was one story in the Bridgeport (Connecticut) Herald in 1901 about Whitehead flying, but that's considered to be fiction, as is the story about him flying in Pittsburgh. Scientific American had articles that talked about Whitehead gliding, but not about flying a powered plane. Those "attendees" wrote those affidavits 30-plus years later. It's a fun story and a good look at how mythology evolves, but it's flat out not true.

By stl156 — On Jun 11, 2012
@kentuckycat - There is nothing wrong with your fascination and to be honest, I feel that this era and topic is something that is quite unique in history.

Despite the fact of how dangerous it was, pretty much anyone could learn to fly a plane and there were even flying clubs across the country where people would simply fly planes as a hobby!

I am trying to imagine something like this happening nowadays as the technological advances have made it more complex and not as charming, at least in my opinion, to fly a plane.

This was the only time in history in which a complete amateur of any kind could fly a plane if they wanted to and was a time when seeing a plane meant a great deal.

This topic is actually a great subject as a cultural study and I am wondering if there are any television specials or academic based articles or even books that deal with this topic?

By kentuckycat — On Jun 11, 2012

I have to say that I have always had a strange obsession with early air travel as I find it to be something that is so impressive, but the means and ways they flew and designed their planes back then were so primitive.

A lot of stories I like come from WWI as early on the pilots did not know how to engage into hand to hand combat while flying planes, so they would usually just pull out a gun and try to shoot each other while flying!

Another thing that was attempted was mounting a machine gun behind the propeller to shoot at the enemy, but the one problem was that a lot of the bullets would hit the propeller and crash the plane, so a pneumatic system had to be created to shoot bullets when the propeller was out of the way.

These types of things I find incredibly interesting and stories of men like the Red Baron as always great stories to read about as early aviation was quite romanticized even though it was in its infancy.

By Izzy78 — On Jun 10, 2012
@JimmyT - To be honest, it may be a combination of all three as most aviation historians have dismissed Whitehead over the years as someone who has made false claim to the title of flying the first airplane.

The problem with the story is that there were apparently witnesses that claim it flew for several hundred feet and crashed into a building in Pittsburgh, but there is nothing at all reported on this and the testimony was not sworn.

Also, when the Smithsonian sent someone to investigate the plane, the one Whitehead showed them was deemed to not be possible to fly and they pretty much blew him off as a failed inventor.

Despite all this it got press because several dozen people were competing to become the first to fly and it was only a matter of time before someone finally did it, and the Wright brothers happened to be the first ones.

This in itself was controversial as it sparked off a lot of false claims and Whitehead's claim is the most famous of them all.

By JimmyT — On Jun 10, 2012
Wow, how interesting that the Wright brothers were probably not the first to fly in the air.

I really have to wonder why I have not heard as much about this before, because the invention of flying is considered one of the greatest achievements in human history and to think that history has been wrong for all these years is something to really take in.

I have to wonder if this is a case of mis-reporting in the media or if it is a simply case of something new coming to light or if it is something that is not substantiated by enough witnesses to make a legitimate claim?

Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology...
Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.