We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are the Smallest Genomes?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Genomes are the code of life -- the molecular blueprint that builds every living organism. Found coded in DNA in the nucleus of the cell, the human genome has about 3 billion amino acid base pairs and 20,000-25,000 protein-coding genes. This is relatively typical with a metazoan organism. Genome size does not directly correlate to the complexity of the organism, but does abstractly, especially when comparing genome lengths between multicellular and unicellular organisms. Parasites have the smallest genomes of any multicellular organism, having undergone a process known as genetic streamlining.

Some organisms have truly tiny genomes, the smallest genomes yet discovered. As of 2011, the smallest reported genome found outside an organelle was the Tremblaya genome, which has just 121 genes, and is found in a bacteria found in mealybugs. Other extremely small genomes include Candidatus Carsonella rudii, also known as C. rudii, at just 159,662 base pairs, with approximately 182 genes. This bacteria is found in sap-sucking insects called jumping plant lice. An endosymbiont, C. rudii lives in specialized organs within the insect called bacteriomes. They have a mutually beneficial relationship, with the insect's body providing the bacteria with nutrients and shelter, and the bacteria giving the insect vitamins and amino acids.

The second smallest non-viral genome is found in Nanoarchaeum equitaans, a thermophilic archaea found among hydrothermal vents on the Atlantic Ocean floor, around the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. N. equitaans is a highly unusual organism, lacking certain metabolic pathways found in practically every other living thing, and being given its own phylum in domain Archaea. Its genome is 490,885 base pairs long. This is among the smallest genomes of any living thing. Like C. rudii, N. equitaans is an obligatory symbiont of another organism, in this case, the archeon Ignicoccus, from which it gets many essential biomolecules.

Of all the smallest genomes mentioned previously, the genome-bearing organism was an obligatory symbiont of another. But the smallest genome out of any free-living organism can be found in the bacteria Mycoplasma genitalium, which is found on the respiratory tracts and genitals of primates, such as humans. This bacterium was first isolated in 1980 from urethral specimens of two male paints with inflammation of the urethra. Thought to be first among the smallest genomes under the discovery of C. rudii in 2002, M. gentalium has only 582,970 base pairs and 482 protein-coding genes. M. genitalium has been used as a model for the Minimal Genome Project, which seeks to create a bacterium with the minimum genome necessary to sustain life.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov , Writer
Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism to his articles. An avid blogger, Michael is deeply passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. His professional experience includes work with the Methuselah Foundation, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and Lifeboat Foundation, further showcasing his commitment to scientific advancement.

Discussion Comments

By Charred — On Jan 15, 2012

@hamje32 - I think it’s the functionality of the bacteria that defines it as simple, not just its makeup.

For example one of the simplest bacteria mentioned in the article helps to suck sap. That’s pretty simple if you ask me, nothing complicated there.

As to whether bacteria are fundamentally simple, you would have to define simplicity, wouldn’t you? I believe that they are, when you consider the billions of cells that are needed to create more complex organisms like animals and human beings.

That’s my two cents worth, but I don’t think things like lice are all that complicated. We simply haven’t understood everything just yet.

By hamje32 — On Jan 14, 2012

@miriam98 - Well, I’m not a scientist and I suspect you are not one either. The genetic map of the human DNA has been quite a breakthrough as you rightly pointed out.

I think it will only be a matter of time before scientists can create the simplest of bacterium. As to your question about the challenges for doing so, I think it has to do with the chemical nature of life.

What, exactly, is life? We can create machines and we can mix chemicals, but can we create chemical machines? This is life as we currently understand it – or at least as I understand it.

Would the first synthetic bacteria most likely be something that is electronic or mechanical in nature instead? Would it use nano technology? I may be in over my head with this line of questioning but I think this is where the challenges lie.

By miriam98 — On Jan 13, 2012

In my opinion DNA genomes are testament to the fact that there is no such thing as simple celled life. If the second smallest genome is nearly half a million base pairs long, then there is nothing simple about it in my opinion. (I am of course not a scientist.)

We have yet to get to the place where we can create even the simplest of genomes artificially, although scientists have become quite adept at splicing and dicing existing genomes.

Scientists have mapped the human genomes but creating simple bacteria is still a difficult feat. Why is that? It can only be explained by the fact that there are layers of complexity behind the superficial “simplicity” of bacterial life.

Michael Anissimov

Michael Anissimov

Writer

Michael Anissimov is a dedicated All The Science contributor and brings his expertise in paleontology, physics, biology...
Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.