We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Olbers' Paradox?

By Phil Riddel
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Olbers’ Paradox, also known as the dark night sky paradox, is the name given to the problem of explaining why the sky is dark at night. The puzzle was first posed at a time when it was assumed that the universe was static, infinite in extent and infinitely old. Based on these assumptions, it would seem that the sky should be bright, as there would be an infinite number of stars that would cover every point in the sky. The paradox is named after Heinrich Olbers, who, in 1826, stated that every line of sight would end at a star, making the sky bright. The problem, however, had come up several times previously in the history of astronomy, going back to the 16th century.

The earliest known reference to the paradox comes from the astronomer Thomas Digges in 1576, who encountered the problem in his description of an infinite universe with a random distribution of stars. In 1610, Johannes Kepler cited what was to become known as Olbers’ paradox to show that the universe must be finite. There seemed to be a problem with a finite universe, however, which was that it would collapse in on itself due to the gravitational attraction of the stars and planets within it. Most astronomers therefore assumed that the universe was infinite and so the paradox remained.

Initial suggestions that most of the stars were too far away to be seen were quickly rejected. If the universe was infinitely old, light from stars would have an infinite amount of time to reach us, so even the most distant stars would contribute to a bright sky. It can be shown mathematically that for an infinite universe with evenly distributed stars, the whole sky must be as bright as an average star. The brightness of stars diminishes with distance, but the number of stars increases with distance, without limit in an infinite universe. The effects cancel out, leaving a bright sky.

Various further attempts were made to solve the puzzle over the next few hundred years. One early attempt at an explanation was that most starlight was obscured by dust. While it is true that dust clouds in our galaxy block large areas of it from view, if there were an infinite number of stars, eventually all the dust would heat up and glow, just like the stars.

Another suggestion was that the stars were not distributed randomly, but were arranged in groups with large voids in between. We now know that this is, in fact the case: stars are grouped into galaxies, which are grouped in clusters and superclusters. On the largest scale, however, the universe is homogenous and Olbers’ paradox, as described by Olbers himself, states that every line of sight must end at a star. Phrased this way, it is clear that a non-random grouping of stars could only account for the dark sky if the stars happened to be lined up behind one another, blocking one another’s light — a scenario no one could take seriously.

It was not until the discovery by Edwin Hubble, in 1929, that the universe is expanding that a resolution to Olbers’ paradox presented itself. It is now known that the observable universe is expanding at a rate that increases with distance and, looking backward in time, we arrive at a point of tiny volume and huge density. This gives two reasons why the sky is dark. The first, and most important, reason is that the universe has a finite age, so there would not have been time for the light from stars beyond a certain distance to reach us. A second reason is that the expansion of the universe results in a Doppler shift in the light from stars that increases with distance; beyond a certain distance, all the light would be shifted beyond the visible spectrum, rendering any stars invisible.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.