We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the International Astronomical Union (IAU)?

Mary McMahon
Updated May 21, 2024
Our promise to you
All The Science is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At All The Science, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) is an organization which coordinates the work of national astronomy associations along with professional astronomers. The IAU promotes advancement in the science of astronomy, along with protection of astronomy as a scientific field. It is a member organization of the International Council for Science, a group of international scientific organizations which includes the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry and the International Mathematical Union, among many others.

This organization was founded in 1919 with the melding of several astronomy organizations. It is based in Paris, France, and includes individual professional members, most of whom are leaders in the field of astronomy, along with numerous national astronomy organizations. While the bulk of the International Astronomical Union's work is focused on advancements in professional astronomy, the organization also works with groups which include amateur astronomers among their members, and it recognizes the valuable contributions made by some amateur astronomers.

One of the key aspects of the work of the International Astronomical Union is the development of uniform and consistent terminology through the Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature. The organization has extensively defined and designated terms for use in astronomy so that astronomers can clearly communicate with each other. When an astronomer writes about a “planet” in a scientific paper, for example, other astronomers know precisely what sort of celestial body that astronomer is referring to, thanks to the standards set by the IAU.

There are several parts to the IAU. The first is the General Assembly, a collective of the representative member nations which meets every three years to set policy. The locations of General Assembly meetings rotate, giving every member nation an opportunity to host the International Astronomical Union. The organization as a whole is broken into divisions, with each division subdivided into commissions. The commissions in turn have a large pool of working groups and programs which work on individual issues.

For reasons of standardization, astronomy texts usually stick with terminology which has been defined by the International Astronomical Union, and the organization publishes updates periodically so that people in the field can keep up with changing terminology. The definitions published by the IAU are not without controversy, however, as scientists are a notoriously stickling and argumentative bunch, and astronomers are no exception. The decision to downgrade Pluto from a "planet" to a "dwarf planet" and later a "plutoid," for example, attracted a great deal of attention.

All The Science is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Link to Sources
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a All The Science researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments
By hamje32 — On Feb 27, 2012

@Charred - Yes, anytime you have assemblies, there will be a uniquely political nature to the kind of work you do. The International Astronomical Union Symposium is no exception.

People deliberate, they disagree, they vote. It’s the nature of the beast. I don’t think definitions are as important as scientific experiments personally.

But since we are moving towards a global society I can see why the work of the symposium is important.

By Charred — On Feb 27, 2012

@SkyWhisperer - Standards are important. I am glad the organization exists to establish those standards. Anytime you establish standards, however, you will run into controversy from time to time.

We have the metric system, for example. This is an international standard, yet the United States is still lax to implement the metric system. I figure we’ll catch up in a few more decades.

Still, it doesn’t make sense to make the rest of the world stick with the old English system, does it? The metric system makes more sense in my opinion.

In the final analysis, whatever standards you set forth, you must be able to defend them, and consistency is a big requirement. If the changes bother you that much, just read your old astronomy books, written before the latest discoveries.

By everetra — On Feb 26, 2012

@SkyWhisperer - I don’t think it was by fiat actually. They found another planet further out than Pluto. This other planet was larger than Pluto yet it was called a “dwarf planet.”

I don’t know all the criteria for calling a planet a dwarf planet. However, the astronomic society was faced with a problem. If the last planet, bigger than Pluto, was a dwarf planet, why was Pluto a planet?

I think in the end it came down to consistency. So they had to redefine Pluto as a dwarf planet. It’s still part of the solar system, but it doesn’t really hold its own, so to speak, like the other planets do.

I don’t think there was an agenda driving the decision. Science is a process of discovery. Sometimes you need to redefine your assumptions based on new data.

By SkyWhisperer — On Feb 25, 2012

Where did the astronomical society get the nerve to downgrade Pluto from a planet to a dwarf planet? When that happened, they were held up to all sorts of ridicule in the press.

Sometimes I wonder if there is a hidden agenda driving this decision making. But people, let’s be serious. Pluto was never a threat to anybody’s astronomical worldview. It’s so far out there, and its discovery was heralded as a great achievement and a welcome addition to the solar system.

Now it’s been shown the back door so to speak, because the society decided, almost by fiat, to redefine what it means to be a planet.

Mary McMahon
Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Learn more
All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

All The Science, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.